Some free discourse is upsetting, it’s frustrating but the Supreme Court reminds us in 1964 with unanimity: “we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.” The free speech we find most difficult to tolerate is the speech that must be defended …and responded to “vehemently”. I applaud all who engage particularly during a time of uncertainty and threat.
🚨 New peer-reviewed evidence linking mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to cancer recurrence and increased incidence raises urgent questions.
A case from Kochi Medical School, Japan, published in the Journal of Dermatological Science, details an 85-year-old woman in remission from breast cancer for over a year.
One month after her sixth mRNA vaccine dose in early 2023, she developed aggressive metastatic skin lesions.
Biopsies confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma with high mitotic activity.
Immunohistochemistry revealed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in nearly all tumor cells’ cytoplasm and nuclei—a novel finding.
No nucleocapsid protein was detected, confirming the vaccine as the spike source, not a natural infection.
Professor Shigetoshi Sano, the lead author, stated, “The presence of spike protein but not nucleocapsid protein in cancer cells is a novel finding… strongly suggesting a potential link between mRNA vaccines and cancer progression/metastasis.”
The study proposes several mechanisms for this link.
Vaccine mRNA or ...
