Some free discourse is upsetting, it’s frustrating but the Supreme Court reminds us in 1964 with unanimity: “we consider this case against the background of a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.” The free speech we find most difficult to tolerate is the speech that must be defended …and responded to “vehemently”. I applaud all who engage particularly during a time of uncertainty and threat.